Last updated:
Author(s):
Amira Al-Aamri, Syafiq Kamarul Azman, Gihan Daw Elbait, Habiba Alsafar, Andreas Henschel
Publish date:
21 September 2023
Journal:
BMC Bioinformatics
PubMed ID:
37735350

Abstract

BackgroundPlummeting DNA sequencing cost in recent years has enabled genome sequencing projects to scale up by several orders of magnitude, which is transforming genomics into a highly data-intensive field of research. This development provides the much needed statistical power required for genotype-phenotype predictions in complex diseases.MethodsIn order to efficiently leverage the wealth of information, we here assessed several genomic data science tools. The rationale to focus on on-premise installations is to cope with situations where data confidentiality and compliance regulations etc. rule out cloud based solutions. We established a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative comparison between BCFtools, SnpSift, Hail, GEMINI, and OpenCGA. The tools were compared in terms of data storage technology, query speed, scalability, annotation, data manipulation, visualization, data output representation, and availability.ResultsTools that leverage sophisticated data structures are noted as the most suitable for large-scale projects in varying degrees of scalability in comparison to flat-file manipulation (e.g., BCFtools, and SnpSift). Remarkably, for small to mid-size projects, even lightweight relational database.ConclusionThe assessment criteria provide insights into the typical questions posed in scalable genomics and serve as guidance for the development of scalable computational infrastructure in genomics.

Related projects

Our motivation for studying the UK Biobank data set is based on the observation that traditional detection methods for finding indicators of a particular disease…

Institution:
Khalifa University of Science and Technology, United Arab Emirates

All projects